Though the deal was signed under the watch of current Secretary of
State John Kerry, the Wall Street Journal reported last year that
Hillary Clinton, in her last months as secretary of state, “helped open
the door to…an acceptance that Tehran would maintain at least some
capacity to produce nuclear fuel.” The report cited a “string of
high-level meetings” in 2012 in which “the secretary of state and White
House concluded that they might have to let Iran continue to enrich
uranium at small levels, if the diplomacy had any hope of succeeding.”
“We are not honoring our commitment to lift the sanctions on Sudan,”JNS.org. “We are lifting sanctions on Iran, which is increasingly becoming more dangerous than ever before to all the Middle East and the rest of the world. What does this tell our friends?…Therefore, Hillary Clinton should not be elected, because she will continue Obama’s policies.”
Paul tells
But Paul’s opposition of Clinton is about more than policy. It’s personal.
Paul says that in August 2011, during Clinton’s time as secretary of state
“We are not honoring our commitment to lift the sanctions on Sudan,”JNS.org. “We are lifting sanctions on Iran, which is increasingly becoming more dangerous than ever before to all the Middle East and the rest of the world. What does this tell our friends?…Therefore, Hillary Clinton should not be elected, because she will continue Obama’s policies.”
Paul tells
But Paul’s opposition of Clinton is about more than policy. It’s personal.
Paul says that in August 2011, during Clinton’s time as secretary of state
No comments:
Post a Comment